
This is where I save interesting links.
-
Crashing the Car of Pax Americana
“You cannot unring this bell. Sure, you can reverse this policy and that policy, and god knows we’re going to get plenty of that, but you can never go back to the way things were before. Once you toss over the game table, even if you reset the table exactly as it was before, the other players must take into account the possibility that you will toss it over again. Their reactions in every game you play with them in the future will be different, much more wary and suspicious, and game outcomes that required a measure of trust and coordination will now be completely out of reach. You may still be the most able game player overall, but you will be surprised by how clever the less ‘powerful’ players can be, especially if they work together.”
-
Another tariff link, sorry
This Twitter article by Molson Hart, with manufacturing experience and grasp of the details, is one of the best commentaries I’ve read on the Trump tariff’s so far.
Some thoughts and highlights from the article.
He 14 reasons why the Trump tariffs won’t work.
Lots of dire warnings in this. Again, lots of good fine grain details on a complex subject.
Having the inside knowledge Molson has is important to understanding this issue. I think one can also rely on their own ignorance (cope) in a scenario like this by thinking about how possible and likely all of this “reshoring to bring back the jobs” really is.
Meaning, it is generous to say that I know nothing about manufacturing, supply chains, and the like. I do know, though, that it takes like 6-9 weeks to get a passport in the U.S.
It seems unimaginable to me that it wouldn’t take YEARS to move buildings, train workers, and build do the work efficiently, all while we’re saying it won’t cause a recession and don’t look at the stock market folks because it doesn’t matter.
Because it’s so possible to wrap my head around it, I can only chalk this up to grift. EDIT (4/7/25): Or, that he really might go hard psyop on the 3rd term talk and this is all pretext.
Here are some highlights for the Twitter article:
4. The effective cost of labor in the United States is higher than it looks
“In China, there are no people who are too fat to work. The workers don’t storm off midshift, never to return to their job. You don’t have people who insist on being paid in cash so that they can keep their disability payments, while they do acrobatics on the factory floor that the non-disabled workers cannot do.
Chinese workers much less likely to physically attack each other and their manager. They don’t take 30 minute bathroom breaks on company time. They don’t often quit because their out-of-state mother of their children discovered their new job and now receives 60% of their wages as child support. They don’t disappear because they’ve gone on meth benders.
And they don’t fall asleep on a box midshift because their pay from yesterday got converted into pills. And they can do their times tables. To manufacture, you need to be able to consistently and accurately multiply 7 times 9 and read in English, and a disturbingly large portion of the American workforce cannot do that.”
This tracks, relatively, with anecdotes from a friend who works in manufacturing and has talked about the quality of the workforce.
5. We don’t have the infrastructure to manufacture
“When you start manufacturing, every single component, from factory to factory, needs to be moved, increasing the number of trucks on the road many times.
Paving more roads, modernizing our seaports, improving our airports, speeding up our train terminals, and building power plants in the costliest nation in the world to build is a huge undertaking that people are not appreciating when they say “well, we’ll just make it in America”.”
6. Made in America will take time.
“It takes at least, in the most favorable of jurisdictions, 2 years (if you can get the permits) to build a factory in the United States. I know because I’ve done it. From there, it can take 6 months to a year for it to become efficient. It can take months for products to come off the assembly lines. All this ignores all the infrastructure that will need to be built (new roads, new power plants, etc.) to service the new factory.
By the time “made in America” has begun, we will be electing a new president.”
This isn’t a totally quack conspiracy, because Trump’s already floating a third term, but part of me wonders if they just know they’re gonna try and blow right into a third term and so it wouldn’t hold that a this all can’t be accomplished in his “last” term.
8. Most Americans are going to hate manufacturing
“Americans want less crime, good schools for their kids, and inexpensive healthcare.
They don’t want to be sewing shirts.
The people most excited about this new tariff policy tend to be those who’ve never actually made anything, because if you have, you’d know how hard the work is.
When I first went to China as a naive 24 year old, I told my supplier I was going to “work a day in his factory!” I lasted 4 hours. It was freezing cold, middle of winter, I had to crouch on a small stool, hunched over, assembling little parts with my fingers at 1/4 the speed of the women next to me. My back hurt, my fingers hurt. It was horrible. That’s a lot of manufacturing.
And enjoy the blackouts, the dangerous trucks on the road, the additional pollution, etc. Be careful what you wish for America. Doing office work and selling ideas and assets is a lot easier than making actual things.”
9. The labor does not exist to make good products
“The United States is trying to bring back the jobs that China doesn’t even want. They have policies to reduce low value manufacturing, yet we are applying tariffs to bring it back. It’s incomprehensible.”
12. Enforcement of the tariffs will be uneven and manipulated
Imagine two companies which import goods into the United States. One is based in China, while the other is based in the United States. They both lie about the value of their goods so that they have to pay less tariffs.
What happens to the China company? Perhaps they lose a shipment when it’s seized by the US government for cheating, but they won’t pay additional fines because they’re in China, where they’re impervious to the US legal system.
What happens to the USA company? Owners go to prison.
Who do you think is going to cheat more on tariffs, the China or the US company?
Exactly.
So, in other words, paradoxically, the policies which are designed to help Americans, will hurt them more than the competition these policies are designed to punish.
14. Michael Jordan sucked at baseball
America is the greatest economic power of all time. We’ve got the most talented people in the world and we have a multi-century legacy of achieving what so many other countries could not.
Michael Jordan is arguably the greatest basketball player of all time, perhaps even the greatest athlete of all time.
He played baseball in his youth. What happened when he switched from basketball to baseball? He went from being an MVP champion to being a middling player in the minor leagues. 2 years later, he was back to playing basketball.
-
Businesses can be not that, quickly
Another post that takes a fine detail out of this whole vague narrative and hammers home the point.
This can get bad for people quickly.
-
“We can reshore. Just not like this.”
Memorable post, with lots of specific questions and details, on the recent tariffs by the Trump 2.0 admin.
This level of thinking and questioning is so rare in the info ecosystem around issues like this. I feel like I mostly encounter certainty from one side or the other.
But to question it in extreme detail is necessary to form some kind of understanding. If nothing else, it’s a reminder that things are complicated and require a lot of thinking and detail at the “top of the funnel” to get anywhere.
-
Scott Alexander on Blogging
-
Tick-Tock
“It was the summer of 1996, early June, and I was teaching a course at Simmons College in Boston to make some extra dough. Jennifer was clerking for a lawfirm down in Dallas, pregnant with our first child. My dad called. He and my mom were in London, where they had rented a small flat for a month. Did I want to come over and stay for a few days? As it happened, I had five days free, perfect for a long weekend trip. I walked down to a cheapo travel agency on Boylston (yes, a physical travel agency), and found a ticket for $600 or thereabouts. Seemed like a lot. I could have afforded it, by which I mean there was room on my credit card to buy it, not that I could really afford it. $600 was a lot of money to me. That said, I hadn’t seen my parents since Christmas, and my dad sounded so … happy. This was a special trip for them, a chance to LIVE in a city that my father LOVED, and this was my chance to share it with them. But $600. I dunno. I called my father and told him that I just couldn’t swing it. He understood. He was a very practical guy. The call lasted all of 20 seconds. You know, international long distance being so expensive and all.
I never saw my father again. He died a few weeks after he and my mother got home.
Tick-tock.
Yeah, I know a few things about Time.
I know that the moving finger writes, and having writ, moves on.
I know that I would give anything to go back to that week in June 1996 and buy that stupid ticket that I couldn’t “afford” but really I could afford and spend five more days with my father and not do anything special but just BE with him and share a beer at that pub that he mentioned on the phone but that I just can’t remember the name of no matter how hard I try and it’s weird but that’s what bugs me most of all.”
Ben Hunt, Epsilon Theory
Ben Hunt is a very direct writer and thinker. When I read him, I feel as if he is angry with me — in an urgent and helpful way.
This is the second time I’ve come across this part of his essay series called “The Long Now“, which I’m just starting to read in full, but it grabbed me — I mean in that aggressive way — just as well this time too.
The future hasn’t really become a threat, rather than a promise, to me yet but I feel his urgency to buy the plane ticket and go on the trip.
To live — really, live! — is to believe in and plan for the future but not wait around for it.
-
“Is it okay?”
This essay from Robin Sloan (new to me!), shared by a friend, thinks about the outcomes of giving away (unwillingly) our collective creation of the internet to the AI.
This particular section was worth remembering and thinking about:
The Everything framework is pretty cool. Basically, we gave everyone the ability to type into one book and the result is something so much more interesting that what you could do if you created a recreation — or a model of — this if you set out to.
And so what right does the AI companies have to train on that and build the models on it?
If it gives us super science then that’s good. If it just churns out various recreations of what we do as humans faster, then that’s not good.
Whatever the middle is of the outcome is what will be interesting to critique when the time (period) comes.
If it goes well, it’ll almost certain be a wonderful tradeoff. If we don’t break through the AI-slop malaise and just get social media accounts engagement farming us until the cows come home, not worth the tradeoff.
-
“Just spend the time thinking”
I’ve thought about how true this could be from an attentional perspective with wanting to get better at something.
I.e., if I wanted to get very good at skateboarding, or thinking, or wanted to get progressively smarter at a thing, Time + Effort X Attention seems to = Progress.
Most of us are used to waiting on an influencer of some sort to give us a template or formula to follow to do a thing. That’s not really necessary.
Freedom is breaking free of other formulas to go and discover for your(my)self.
-
Style to remember
This style and taste in this tweet made me feel good when I saw it. So much of what’s presented to me online seems like it’s meant to make the observer feel a negative emotion. I don’t think it’s that intentional, I just think the Algorithm has conditioned new content with an awareness that if it is negative, it will receive more engagement.